Update: Pampers Jumbo Packs only $5 each at CVS after Sale, Coupon and Extra Care Bucks this Week!

NEVER MISS A HOT DEAL! SUBSCRIBE TO OUR DAILY EMAIL NEWSLETTER!

Pampers-Baby-Dry-Diapers-Printable-CouponHere is a great update to the new Pampers coupons that we got this morning. These are on sale at CVS this week and they are part of the P&G Extra Care Bucks promotion. You can get them for only $5 each!

$1.50/1 Pampers Baby Dry Diapers printable (preclipped)
$1.50/1 Pampers Cruisers Diapers printable (preclipped)
$1.50/1 Pampers Swaddlers Diapers printable (preclipped)

At CVS:
BUY FOUR PAMPERS JUMBO PACK DIAPERS – on sale 2/$18
Get $10 Extra Care Bucks when you buy $30 worth select P&G Products (limit 1)
use four of the coupons listed above
Price at register: $30 but receive $10 ECB
Net Price: $20 ($5 each!)

Thanks Hip2Save


OUR TOP PICKS (UPDATED 9/21/17):
-$20+ of INSANE New High-Value Neutrogena Printable Coupons!
-Another $10 off $10 Lane Bryant Coupon = More FREEBIES!
-Join Topcashback and get a FREE Elite Gourmet Slow Cooker!
-THREE New BOGO Yogurt Printable Coupons!
-HURRY - High-Value $1/1 Silk Half Gallon printable coupon!
-FREE $3 Visa Digital Gift Card when you join ShopTracker
-Free Atkins Quick Start Kit plus $5 of coupons!


GET CONNECTED WITH COUPONAHOLIC:
-SUBSCRIBE to our Daily Email Newsletter <==THE BEST WAY
-FOLLOW us on Instagram <==SECOND BEST WAY
-LIKE the Couponaholic .NET Facebook Page
-JOIN the I am a Couponaholic! Facebook Group
-FOLLOW CouponaholicNet on Twitter
-FOLLOW CouponaholicNet on Pinterest

Comments

  1. Rhonda Furia says:

    How often do I come up off on your deals? It’s unreal and I don’t know what I’m doing wrong. Please help me…I’m referring to the pampers deal…

    Buy 4 @ 2/$18 = $9.00 ea x 4 is $36.00
    -$10.00 ECB = $26.00
    -$4.50 in Q’s = $21.40 = $5.35 ea.

    Please help me, I like your deals but they confuse me…

    • Monica Bragg says:

      It was my fault. You can use four coupons instead of 3. The math we had was correct but the amount of coupons we had was wrong. Sorry about that.